<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://engagedpublic.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results matching tags 'education' and 'budget'</title><link>http://engagedpublic.com/search/SearchResults.aspx?a=0&amp;o=DateDescending&amp;tag=education,budget&amp;orTags=0</link><description>Search results matching tags 'education' and 'budget'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008 SP1 (Build: 30619.63)</generator><item><title>Hmmm...Where To Cut???</title><link>http://engagedpublic.com/forums/p/742/1107.aspx#1107</link><pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 02:33:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">aabfcb9d-f14f-4700-a9e3-a1479b9a19ef:1107</guid><dc:creator>dogsoldier</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;EP here has this nifty online Colorado budget balancing tool. You can find it on the home page. The thing about is that you can&amp;#39;t comment on it. So, rather than fight another uphill battle, I should post something to a topic that has had no comments, yet is most definately on the Ritter hit list to bring the budget under control.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I actually used the online tool. This site doesn&amp;#39;t indicate the input today but that was me. Guess what. I balanced the budget. I didn&amp;#39;t do it by hacking away at needed educational and human services programs, as the Denver Post would have everyone think to be the &amp;quot;majority&amp;quot; of Colorado opinion. Nope. I looked at where the money was being &amp;quot;played&amp;quot;. Most of it can be recovered from increased taxes and less perks to corporations, and some adjustments to the &amp;quot;other&amp;quot; categories. Those &amp;quot;other&amp;quot; categories would include the enormous overhead and six-figure (I sh_t you not) salaries of the lower-tiered staff in the Departments of the Governor&amp;#39;s Cabinet. A CORA request produced a salary of a HCPF staff member (that would be Medicaid, as in Health Care Reform) that was over ELEVEN THOUSAND DOLLARS A MONTH!!! I forgot to mention the paid for health insurance benefits and the &amp;quot;company&amp;quot; cars: Cadillac Escalades.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you want to balance the budget, you have to follow the REAL money going out in perks and salaries; not the services or educational needs that are in the pony cart headed for the guillotine, along with their very human victims. There is no &amp;quot;cake&amp;quot; for anyone living at $12,000 or less a year to eat. And that &amp;quot;or less&amp;quot; part will become even smaller, while the sick and homeless population swells beyond containment, when the Aid to the Needy Disabled program is demolished on January 1. Yeppers. That huge $200 a month that about 30,000 families have to live on if they are disabled and pending SSI or their SSDI entitlement gets flushed with nary a buh-bye from the gentry.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;...and that&amp;#39;s only just the start of it, folks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, what would you like to do, if not for yourselves, then for your children? Cut those six-figure salaries, corporate perks, Pinnacol Assurance profits ($700 billion with a B), tax credits for the wealthy and the oil and gas industry magnates, uncover the under-the-table pay- offs for permits, to name a few? Or holler, &amp;quot;There&amp;#39;s gold in them thar hills!&amp;quot; and head straight for the Capitol with a paring knife to hack off the pork and get your children medical care, school lunches, a decent teacher to student ratio, or even that piddly $200 bucks a month that keep cancer patients sort of alive until the government decides that cancer is a disabling condition f&amp;#39;rinstance?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>